|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
|
jakelong
Enlightened One
|
      
Quote: from kidd rune at 4:30 pm on Aug. 27, 2008
 Look: The USA was FOUNDED by whites. 
So? does that mean we all have to speak with a british accent and become puritans and say God save the queen?
Before the Whites arrived, North American culture was Amerind: after the Whites arrived and replaced the Amerinds as the majority population, White culture replaced the original civilization, virtually overnight.
and now that majority is no longer a majority in some parts. so whats the justification for making european culture top dog again?
The damage is done, and you shouldn't commit terrible acts because whites did it once.
oh yeah you gotta learn another language because the world is smaller. what a terrible act.
They have land. Keep in mind that they are only 0.8% of the population.
so if whites become the minority they should own only a minority of the land? i guess thats why the white settlers HAD to kill off all those natives.
In spite of the gradual increase in the standard of living and education amongst the Amerinds, they still remain at the very bottom of the social scale in modern America
. thanks to whom?
They have all of South America to live in anyway, the population down there is mestizo, a mix of Amerind,
oh thats right native americans ONLY come from south america. lets push them down there whether they come from there or not.
Whites needed land,
oh yeah thats why hitler had to take over all europe and chase off the jews.
I guess we all must think the EXACT same thing!
then why do you keep answering to my post to them? sounds to me like you trying to speak FOR them. Post edited at 4:51 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 by jakelong
-------
"Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin'
That's how we be survivin'" - BEP
|
|
|
( kidd rune )
Executive
|
So? does that mean we all have to speak with a british accent and become puritans and say God save the queen?
Slowly, due to differing location, our culture slowly, but steadily, changed. There is a German/Scottish/ect. influence also. And we became independent. With our differing government, our culture changed as well.
and now that majority is no longer a majority in some parts. so whats the justification for making european culture top dog again?
There isn't one. The US, over the years, has established a culture. Now it's being changed. It's not European culture, it's American. The last thing I want is for a non European country, such as an African/Asian country to take European culture. Doing so would create mixing because you can't transfer culture without transferring the carriers of it.
so if whites become the minority they should own only a minority of the land? i guess thats why the white settlers HAD to kill off all those natives.
It was in defense. They attacked us FIRST. If you don't believe this, I could make another big post, I'm sure you'll like that...
oh yeah you gotta learn another language because the world is smaller. what a terrible act.
I learned other languages myself, not being FORCED to. We didn't tell the Amerinds to learn our language, they weren't even a part of our country.
. thanks to whom?
Them. Their culture is different. We created a country with American culture. It is SHAPED around American culture. If the culture of America changed, the country would change DRASTICALLY. We have reserves for them, they can live and practice their culture where NOBODY will interfere with them. They know how it is to have their culture taken from them, so they SEPARATE themselves.
oh thats right native americans ONLY come from south america. lets push them down there whether they come from there or not.
They have a small population and they wouldn't even fill up 1/10 of the USA. If they want to live their stone age life, they can do so in reserves we set up for them.
oh yeah thats why hitler had to take over all europe and chase off the jews.
When did this happen? In 1941 and again in 1942, the German Gestapo offered all European Jews transit to Spain, if they would relinquish all their property in Germany and Occupied France; on condition that:
a) none of the deportees travel from Spain to Palestine; and
b) all the deportees be transported from Spain to the USA or British colonies, and there to remain; with entry visas to be arranged by the Jews living there; and
c) $1000.00 ransom for each family to be furnished by the Agency, payable upon the arrival of the family at the Spanish border at the rate of 1000 families daily. The answer of the Zionist leaders was negative, with the following comments:
a) ONLY Palestine would be considered as a destination for the deportees.
b) The European Jews must accede to suffering and death greater in measure than the other nations, in order that the victorious allies agree to a "Jewish State" at the end of the war.
c) No ransom will be paid Chaim Weitzman, the first "Jewish statesman" stated: "The most valuable part of the Jewish nation is already in Palestine, and those Jews living outside Palestine are not too important". Weitzman's cohort, Greenbaum, amplified this statement with the observation "One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Europe".
Obviously they didn't want the Jews anywhere BUT Palestine. Hitler wanted them to leave his country. They wouldn't.
then why do you keep answering to my post to them? sounds to me like you trying to speak FOR them.
I speak for myself.
-------
"We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children"
-David Lane
|
|
|
|
|
jakelong
Enlightened One
|
Quote: from kidd rune at 5:10 pm on Aug. 27, 2008
The last thing I want is for a non European country, such as an African/Asian country to take European culture.
I thought it was American culture and NOT european.
It was in defense.
in defense while europeans were the invaders?
They attacked us FIRST.
You invaded FIRST. Didn't know you are 200 years old btw.
We didn't tell the Amerinds to learn our language, they weren't even a part of our country.
No?
The purpose of Native American boarding schools was to remove Native Americans from their home and cultures in order to change their identities and lifestyles to be like the "white man". Native American children were forced to think and act like the dominant white culture and were not allowed to practice their traditional ways. Not only were languages and beliefs changes, but appearances as well. Hair styles, clothing and even names and body languages were changed. The intention was to completely erase the Indian way of life. The first Indian boarding school was founded by Captain R. H. Pratt in Carlisle, Pennsylvania in 1879. Within a few years, dozens were opened across the United States. (For more information on boarding schools, go to related links.) In the latter 1800's, the United States government instituted an educational policy designed to culturally transform Native Americans into the mainstream of white society, due to continual conflicts between the two cultures. It was believed by the government that by forcing Native Americans to learn English, and by preventing them from practicing their own languages and customs, they would believe in and practice white values. Furthermore, it was felt that the best way to implement this policy would be through boarding schools - which were designed to forcibly remove Indian children from their families and homes at a very early age, thereby isolating them from the language and customs of their homes, and forcing the European American language and culture upon them. In this way, it was hoped by the government that Native Americans would then become "White", and that their traditional languages and cultures would die.
http://aam.wcu.edu/beck/activities.htm
If the culture of America changed, the country would change DRASTICALLY.
they said the same thing when we had Italian immgrants, irish immigrants, russian immigrnats, etc...
They have a small population and they wouldn't even fill up 1/10 of the USA.
so why push them into south america? many native americans come from NORTH america.
In 1941 and again in 1942, the German Gestapo offered all European Jews transit to Spain
again pushing ppl away from their land. typical.
The answer of the Zionist leaders was negative, with the following comments
zionists are not any better than you.
I speak for myself.
then dont stick your nose into my replies to someone else. Post edited at 5:26 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 by jakelong
-------
"Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin'
That's how we be survivin'" - BEP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
whoareyou
Technician
|
Quote: from kidd rune at 2:45 am on Aug. 26, 2008
Quote: from The Artful Dodger at 6:58 pm on Aug. 25, 2008
So the solution to racism is to make everyone the same? No thank you. I don't really have any studies or quotes to back this up, but my theory, (as ridiculous as it sounds I do believe it) is that as tolerance goes up, racism goes down. So by developing in our minds more understanding and tolerance of one another, we can exist in harmony, as opposed to your plan which is basically "we're all racist. we can't help it. let's all separate."
No. We aren't separating because we're racist, but for everyone and to COMBAT racism. Do you not understand that tolerance will NEVER happen? We, as humans, will ALWAYS be different. These crazy ideas you have about FORCING people to live together (which is cruel itself) to help us all accept each other are laughable.
Tolerance builds. It takes generations, and it's hard at first, but if racism is left alone, it builds too. It's stupid to keep races from eachother. The only consequences are negative in the long run. I don't see any positive long-term consequences in prolonging integration and 'seperating races'.
-------
Lord knows I'm a voodoo child.
|
|
|
Takinam
Dairy Product Addict
|
Quote: from whoareyou at 7:37 pm on Aug. 27, 2008
Quote: from kidd rune at 2:45 am on Aug. 26, 2008
Quote: from The Artful Dodger at 6:58 pm on Aug. 25, 2008
So the solution to racism is to make everyone the same? No thank you. I don't really have any studies or quotes to back this up, but my theory, (as ridiculous as it sounds I do believe it) is that as tolerance goes up, racism goes down. So by developing in our minds more understanding and tolerance of one another, we can exist in harmony, as opposed to your plan which is basically "we're all racist. we can't help it. let's all separate."
No. We aren't separating because we're racist, but for everyone and to COMBAT racism. Do you not understand that tolerance will NEVER happen? We, as humans, will ALWAYS be different. These crazy ideas you have about FORCING people to live together (which is cruel itself) to help us all accept each other are laughable.
Tolerance builds. It takes generations, and it's hard at first, but if racism is left alone, it builds too. It's stupid to keep races from eachother. The only consequences are negative in the long run. I don't see any positive long-term consequences in prolonging integration and 'seperating races'.
Rune acts if everyone is as deluded as he. That every child borne out of the womb has an inherent dislike and an automatic affinity with one stranger child over another simply because of the color of his/her skin. He acts as if tolerant societies don't exist and that all multicultural societies have overwhelming faults that more homogenous societies don't have. The fact that resonates throughout our world is that multicultural soceities are some of the most technologically advanced, innovative and improved/improving countries in the world. They also share the knowledge of a vast collection of peoples and are a collection of the mosaic (Canada)/melting pot (America) philosiphies. There are many positives to living within a multicultural society such as Canada and America that is why both countries share high quality of life and serve as very attractive settlements for people from all over the world. European countries, included. Largely homogenous countries aren't heaven on earth. If we are to look at countries in Eastern Europe, then we would see a dramatic change in the quality of life when compared to their Western European counterparts. The Middle East serves as even better example.
Post edited at 8:01 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 by Takinam
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| / / / Viewing Topic | |
|
862 users online 
186468 members 
You have 1 new message.
